Insights

Valuer’s Professional Liability: Responsibility Reviewed in High Court decision

30.11.2023

5 minute read

Authored by

Kellie Williams-Jauvel, an experienced dispute resolution partner, specialising in contentious probate and complex business disputes, standing in a modern office environment.

Kellie Williams-Jauvel

Partner, Head of Department

Message

Share

LinkedIn icon

Valuer’s Professional Liability: Valuation and Adviser Responsibility Reviewed in New High Court decision.

The recent High Court decision in Hope Capital Limited v Alexander Reece Thomson LLP ([2023] EWHC 2389 (KB)) has clarified the scope of valuer duties, for the purpose of bridging finance, and highlighted interesting considerations surrounding losses arising from negligent valuations.  

Background

Cedar House, a Grade II listed property in Cobham, Surrey, with a history dating back to the 15th Century, was valued in February 2018 at £4,000,000 in a report by valuers Alexander Reece Thomson LLP (ART), for the purpose of securing a bridging loan. A loan, totalling £2,448,000 (including interest and fees), was advanced by Hope Capital Limited (Hope) to St Anselm Heritage Properties Limited (St Anselm) based on the valuation by ART. 

St Anselm defaulted on the loan in late 2018, and Cedar House was eventually sold for £1,400,001 in 2020. Hope alleged it had lost a total of £2,527,749 in the transaction, including capital loss, contractual interest, and loss of profits. 

Determining losses

Hope argued that ART’s valuation was negligent and had ART’s report reflected the true value of the property, they would not have granted the loan to St Anselm.  

Hope claimed that because the loan was solely granted in reliance of ART’s negligent report, the losses they sustained should include both a) the difference in value between the negligent valuation and the actual value of the property; and b) the financial losses arising from entering into the loan arrangement at all. The latter is unusual, as it means that it would be possible to hold a professional advisor liable for all foreseeable consequences in a commercial transaction.  

Whilst ART eventually admitted to a breach of its duty when preparing the report, they argued that the total loss should be zero, considering that the value of the security remained the same at the date of default as at the valuation date (£2,475,000), surpassing the loan amount, and therefore, no loss occurred.  

They also alleged there had been contributory negligence on Hope’s part and that the value of the property had been affected by several external factors, such as the Covid-19 pandemic and various section 146 notices served following breaches of the lease.  

Outcome and further comments

It was held that the purpose of the valuation was to protect Hope in relation to the value of the property, and not all other foreseeable risks upon entering into the loan. 

Whilst Hope had relied upon ART’s report when entering into the loan, it does not mean that the professional valuer should be held liable for all losses arising out of the commercial transaction.  

This is the case even where such a report was a persuasive reason for entering into such an arrangement, as was the case here. Therefore, ART were only held liable for the difference in value between the negligent valuation and the actual value of the property.  

This case exemplifies why professional advisers should be mindful of, and consider carefully, the purpose of which they are providing advice and producing reports in such transactions.  

How can Morr & Co help?

If you have any questions or would like any further information on the content of this article, please do not hesitate to contact our Dispute Resolution team on 01737 854500 or email info@morrlaw.com and a member of our expert team will get back to you.

Disclaimer
Although correct at the time of publication, the contents of this newsletter/blog are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute, legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article. Please contact us for the latest legal position.

Stay informed

Receive regular insights and updates from our legal experts.

Get in touch

Please fill out the form below, and one of our team will get back to you as soon as we can.

Please choose from the below options so that we can direct your enquiry to the right team member

Sorry, we do not provide criminal law advice.

You may wish to contact your local Citizens Advice Bureau or your local Law Centre, who will be able to help you find support.

Sorry, we do not provide advice on consumer disputes.

You may wish to contact your local Citizens Advice Bureau or your local Law Centre, who will be able to help you find support.

Sorry, we do not provide advice on benefits related disputes.

You may wish to contact your local Citizens Advice Bureau or your local Law Centre, who will be able to help you find support.


Please note that we are currently only providing this service to our existing clients.

You should bear in mind that if your dispute is valued at less than £10,000 you will not be able to recover your legal fees from your opponent.

You may wish to consider consulting the Citizens Advice Bureau or your local Law Centre as an alternative.

In order to enable us to give you an accurate estimate of our likely costs to advise you, we will need to review the key documents. As a guide, our costs for reviewing the key documents and giving you initial advice are likely to be in the region of £1,750+VAT.

Before we can confirm whether we are able to act for you, we need to carry out a conflict check to make sure that we have not previously acted for your opponent.

Assuming our conflict check is clear, we will contact you to arrange a time for you to speak to one of our solicitors. Please can you confirm that you still wish to proceed with this enquiry. *

Our fees for debt recovery work typically start at £1,750 + VAT, so it is unlikely that we would be able to help you on this occasion. You may wish to contact the Citizens Advice Bureau or your local law centre, who may be able to help resolve your issue.

We are sorry that we are not able to help you on this occasion.

You may wish to contact the Citizens Advice Bureau or your local law centre, who may be able to help resolve your issue.

If your claim relates to an incident that took place more than 4 years ago, you may not be able to bring a claim unless you were under 18 years old at the time.

We are sorry, but it is unlikely that we are able to help you with your claim on this occasion.

You may wish to contact the Citizens Advice Bureau or your local law centre, who will be able to help you find support.