Insights corporate insight

The great return to the office: can employers force office returns?

08.09.2026

4 minute read

Authored by

Elizabeth, an experienced employment solicitor specialising in discrimination cases and maternity-related issues, offering balanced and practical solutions for workplace matters.

Elizabeth Maxwell

Senior Associate Solicitor

Message

Share

LinkedIn icon

For many employers, the pandemic fundamentally changed the way work is carried out. Remote and hybrid working quickly moved from being a temporary solution to an established way of working and many people seem to relish this change.

Six years on and a growing number of organisations are now encouraging and, in some cases, requiring employees to spend more time in the office. As a result, many businesses are asking the same question:

Can employers simply insist that employees return to the office?

The answer is not always straightforward.

Much will depend on what was agreed when remote and hybrid working arrangements were introduced. Some employees now have contractual rights to work remotely, while others may argue that a long-standing working pattern has become an implied term of their employment.

Employers who attempt to impose a return-to-office requirement without properly considering these issues could find themselves facing grievances, resignations and, in some cases, legal claims and it’s already started.

This is not just a theoretical issue.

Large employers including Amazon, JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Disney and WPP have all taken a firmer approach to office attendance, reflecting a wider shift towards more in-person working.

Why employers want employees to return to the office

It is important to recognise that employers are not seeking a return to the office without good reason.

Most businesses can point to genuine commercial benefits associated with greater workplace attendance. Collaboration, knowledge sharing, supervision and training are often easier when employees are physically present. Building culture, supporting junior staff and fostering stronger relationships between colleagues, can also be more challenging in a predominantly remote environment.

Many employers are also concerned about employee engagement and the long-term impact of remote working on innovation and productivity.

While technology has enabled teams to work effectively from different locations, many organisations believe that something is lost when face-to-face interaction becomes the exception rather than the norm.

The difficulty is that employees have also adapted. Over the last few years, many individuals have organised their lives around hybrid working. Childcare arrangements, caring responsibilities and even decisions about where to live have often been made on the assumption that a degree of flexibility would continue indefinitely.

This can create significant tensions when employers seek to change course. For some employees, an additional two or three days in the office each week may be an inconvenience. For others, it may create genuine practical difficulties and substantial additional costs.

Employers should therefore proceed carefully. A blanket requirement for all employees to return to the office may create legal risks, particularly where certain groups are disproportionately affected.

This is especially relevant where employees have childcare responsibilities or other caring commitments. In those circumstances, employers should be mindful of flexible working requests and the potential for indirect discrimination claims.

How employers should move forward

From a practical perspective, the most successful organisations are likely to be those that communicate openly and explain the business reasons behind any proposed changes. Consulting with employees, considering individual circumstances and applying policies consistently can significantly reduce the risk of disputes.

The reality is that the debate is no longer about whether remote working should exist. It is here to stay. The challenge for employers is determining how much flexibility is appropriate while still meeting the needs of the business.

The organisations that are more likely to thrive are not those that insist on complete office attendance, nor those that allow unrestricted home working. Instead, they will be the employers that find a sensible and pragmatic middle ground that works for both the business and its people.

How can Morr & Co help?

If you have any questions or would like any further information on the contents of this article or assistance in reviewing your existing policies and procedures, please do not hesitate to contact our Employment team on 0333 038 9100 or email employmentEmail@morrlaw.com. Or follow the link to find out more on flexible working.

Disclaimer
Although correct at the time of publication, the contents of this newsletter/blog are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute, legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article. Please contact us for the latest legal position.

Corporate Insights

Stay updated on key changes for you and your business

Get in touch

Please fill out the form below and one of our team will get back to you as soon as we can.

If you are a British Sign Language (BSL) user, you can use SignLive to contact our team, find out more here.


    Please choose from the below options so that we can direct your enquiry to the right team member

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.