Insights

What are the “grounds” of a property for Stamp Duty Land Tax purposes?

04.06.2021

3 minute read

Authored by

Share

LinkedIn icon

On 18th March 2021, the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) released its decision in the appeals of Hyman, Pensfold and Goodfellow [2021] UKUT 0068 (TCC).

The appeals each concerned the sale of a house together with an area of land. The issue in each case was whether all the land sold together with the house formed “part of the garden or grounds” of the house and so attracted the residential rates of SDLT (s116(1)(b) or whether the land could be treated as non-residential for SDLT and therefore attract the much lower rates.

The taxpayers argued, relying in part on pre-2019 HMRC guidance, that land could only be part of “the garden or grounds of” the house if the land was “needed for the reasonable enjoyment of the house having regard to the size and nature of the house”.

The appeals

The appeal by Pensfold related to a property known as Pensfold Farm, Bucks Green, Surrey and comprised a farmhouse and 27 acres of land.

The appeal by Dr and Mrs Goodfellow related to Heathermoor House, Hale Purlieu, Fordingbridge, Hampshire. The property comprised a house and 4.5 acres of land, which was made up of gardens, a swimming pool, garaging, a stable yard and paddocks.

The appeal by Mr and Mrs Hyman related to a property known as “The Farmhouse” which comprised a house and 3.5 acres of land. The house was situated within a rectangular cultivated garden. Outside this garden was a large barn in a bad state of repair. There was a further garden referred to as a “secondary garden”. Most of the rest of the property was a meadow. On one side of the property was a bridleway which was separated from the garden and the meadow by hedges.

The verdict

The Upper Tribunal dismissed the taxpayers’ appeals holding that HMRC’s pre-2019 guidance was simply wrong and that section 116(1)(b) FA 2003 contained no wording which imposed, or even hinted at, a requirement that land can only be a garden or grounds of a dwelling if the land is needed for the reasonable enjoyment of the dwelling.

Following this decision, anyone that has claimed the non-residential rates of SDLT on the purchase of a property due to the size of the surrounding grounds should seek independent legal advice.

How can Morr & Co help?

If you have any questions or would like any further information on the content of this article, please do not hesitate to contact our Tax Litigation team on 01737 854500 or email info@morrlaw.com and a member of our expert team will get back to you.

Disclaimer
Although correct at the time of publication, the contents of this newsletter/blog are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute, legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article. Please contact us for the latest legal position.

Stay informed

Receive regular insights and updates from our legal experts.

Get in touch

Please fill out the form below and one of our team will get back to you as soon as we can.

Please choose from the below options so that we can direct your enquiry to the right team member

Sorry, we do not provide criminal law advice.

You may wish to contact your local Citizens Advice Bureau or your local Law Centre, who will be able to help you find support.

Sorry, we do not provide advice on consumer disputes.

You may wish to contact your local Citizens Advice Bureau or your local Law Centre, who will be able to help you find support.

Sorry, we do not provide advice on benefits related disputes.

You may wish to contact your local Citizens Advice Bureau or your local Law Centre, who will be able to help you find support.


Please note that we are currently only providing this service to our existing clients.

You should bear in mind that if your dispute is valued at less than £10,000 you will not be able to recover your legal fees from your opponent.

You may wish to consider consulting the Citizens Advice Bureau or your local Law Centre as an alternative.

In order to enable us to give you an accurate estimate of our likely costs to advise you, we will need to review the key documents. As a guide, our costs for reviewing the key documents and giving you initial advice are likely to be in the region of £1,750+VAT.

Before we can confirm whether we are able to act for you, we need to carry out a conflict check to make sure that we have not previously acted for your opponent.

Assuming our conflict check is clear, we will contact you to arrange a time for you to speak to one of our solicitors. Please can you confirm that you still wish to proceed with this enquiry. *

Our fees for debt recovery work typically start at £1,750 + VAT, so it is unlikely that we would be able to help you on this occasion. You may wish to contact the Citizens Advice Bureau or your local law centre, who may be able to help resolve your issue.

We are sorry that we are not able to help you on this occasion.

You may wish to contact the Citizens Advice Bureau or your local law centre, who may be able to help resolve your issue.

If your claim relates to an incident that took place more than 4 years ago, you may not be able to bring a claim unless you were under 18 years old at the time.

We are sorry, but it is unlikely that we are able to help you with your claim on this occasion.

You may wish to contact the Citizens Advice Bureau or your local law centre, who will be able to help you find support.