Insights

Should an employee whose job is outsourced transfer to work for the new service provider?

30.09.2015

4 minute read

Share

LinkedIn icon

It is quite common for companies to outsource services such as payroll, HR or IT to an external provider. There is much case law on whether affected employees in an outsourcing situation should transfer with their jobs or remain with their current employer.   In this article we look at recent legal developments providing some helpful clarification for employers.

The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) 2006 Regulations (TUPE) applies to a  ‘service provision change’ providing that before the change in service provider, there is ‘an organised grouping of employees situated in Great Britain which has as its principal purpose the carrying out of activities concerned on behalf of the client.’

It is not unusual for there to be a dispute between the company and the new provider (or between successor providers or at the time any outsourced service is brought back in house) about whether the affected employees are such an ‘organised grouping.’  

How do you decide whether the employees should transfer to the new contractor?  

In Rynda (U) Ltd v Rhijnsburger CA 2015 the claimant successfully argued that TUPE applied to her situation.  Lord Justice Jackson explained the correct approach is to:
1. Identify the service provided to the client – in Rynda the service was the management of the two companies properties;

2. List the activities which staff perform in providing that service – in Rynda this was the administrative work for the properties;

3. Identify those employees who ordinarily carry out those activities  – the claimant was the only employee who undertook all the activities and she spent all her time on them and no other employee ‘provided any significant degree of assistance in the performance of that role’;

4. Decide whether those employees are in a ‘grouping’ for the purposes of carrying out the activities – the claimant was specifically instructed to carry out all the activities.

This is not an easy call. In Eddie Stobart Ltd v Moreman & others EAT 2012 it was held that employees who worked nights, which was when the client happened to place their orders, were not an organised grouping as it was only by ‘happenstance’ rather than any deliberate planning that they worked for this client.  This can be compared to Rynda where the company had actively decided for which client the claimant would work.  The Judge said there had to be ‘an element of conscious organisation’ of the employees into a grouping.

In Seawell Ltd v Ceva Freight (UK) Ltd EAT 2013 although the claimant worked full time on the provision of services he formed part of a group of employees.  However as the whole group did not have as its principal purpose the carrying out of services for the client, the claimant was unsuccessful.

Employees who are temporarily laid off and so not actively carrying out the relevant activities at the time of the service provision transfer, can comprise an organised grouping.  In the very recent case of Inex Home Improvements Ltd v Hodgkins and Others EAT 2015, the Judge held that it would frustrate the purpose of the TUPE Regulations if employees on temporary layoff were not protected by them.  In deciding whether employees on temporary lay off were an organised grouping it is necessary to consider the purpose, length and nature of the cessation of work.   This case has now been referred to an employment tribunal to determine whether on the facts there was a service provision transfer.

How can Morr & Co help?

If you have any questions or would like any further information on the content of this article, please do not hesitate to contact our Employment team on 01737 854500 or email info@morrlaw.com and a member of our expert team will get back to you.

Disclaimer
Although correct at the time of publication, the contents of this newsletter/blog are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute, legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article. Please contact us for the latest legal position.

Stay informed

Receive regular insights and updates from our legal experts.

Get in touch

Receive regular insights and updates from our legal experts.

If you are a British Sign Language (BSL) user, you can use SignLive to contact our team, find out more here.


Please choose from the below options so that we can direct your enquiry to the right team member

Sorry, we do not provide criminal law advice.

You may wish to contact your local Citizens Advice Bureau or your local Law Centre, who will be able to help you find support.

Sorry, we do not provide advice on consumer disputes.

You may wish to contact your local Citizens Advice Bureau or your local Law Centre, who will be able to help you find support.

Sorry, we do not provide advice on benefits related disputes.

You may wish to contact your local Citizens Advice Bureau or your local Law Centre, who will be able to help you find support.


Please note that we are currently only providing this service to our existing clients.

You should bear in mind that if your dispute is valued at less than £10,000 you will not be able to recover your legal fees from your opponent.

You may wish to consider consulting the Citizens Advice Bureau or your local Law Centre as an alternative.

In order to enable us to give you an accurate estimate of our likely costs to advise you, we will need to review the key documents. As a guide, our costs for reviewing the key documents and giving you initial advice are likely to be in the region of £1,750+VAT.

Before we can confirm whether we are able to act for you, we need to carry out a conflict check to make sure that we have not previously acted for your opponent.

Assuming our conflict check is clear, we will contact you to arrange a time for you to speak to one of our solicitors. Please can you confirm that you still wish to proceed with this enquiry. *

Our fees for debt recovery work typically start at £1,750 + VAT, so it is unlikely that we would be able to help you on this occasion. You may wish to contact the Citizens Advice Bureau or your local law centre, who may be able to help resolve your issue.

We are sorry that we are not able to help you on this occasion.

You may wish to contact the Citizens Advice Bureau or your local law centre, who may be able to help resolve your issue.

If your claim relates to an incident that took place more than 4 years ago, you may not be able to bring a claim unless you were under 18 years old at the time.

We are sorry, but it is unlikely that we are able to help you with your claim on this occasion.

You may wish to contact the Citizens Advice Bureau or your local law centre, who will be able to help you find support.